St. Gregory’s Church Woodstock

Sunday, 19 July, 2009, SeventhSunday after Pentecost

The Rev’d Susan Auchincloss


Mark 6:30-34; 53-56

For today’s reading go to:http://bible.oremus.org


These are sobering readings for a person in my position. Anyone who aspires to be a spiritual leader gets fair warning in today's first reading. God expects us to nourish his flock and keep it together. I can't help but ask myself, am I doing that? When I first went to Hawaii I marveled at the lush green pastures, and commented on the cattle, how well fed they were. “If the cattle had only this grass,” I was told, “they would starve to death.” It turned out, that grass was all water. So I worry: am I preaching truth or am I watering it down to where God's flock is being starved? This morning I want to share my thinking about being a faithful shepherd.

First, I looked at the Gospel reading. The twelve have just returned from their first missionary journey. Although the Gospel does not name the place, we may assume that they went to Capernaum, a small village on the shore of the Sea of Galilee. Seeing how drained they were, and knowing they would get no peace in the village, Jesus told them to pile into one of the fishing boats. He thought they could sail to a secluded cove and enjoy some solitude. But that part of the Sea of Galilee lies in a bowl of hills. From anywhere on the hillside you can see a boat and guess where it is going. Throngs of people saw the boat, recognized who was in it, and ran for that cove. Imagine being in that boat, rounding a headland, and finding – not an isolated beach as you expected, but an early day Coney Island.

I asked myself, what drew that crowd? Why did so many run to where they knew Jesus would be? It seems to me that only a basic need could have drawn them – a basic need that was not being met. We are told that food and shelter come first among our drives, but I wonder. Perhaps we really hunger and thirst for meaning in our lives even more than we hunger for food and drink. For instance, later in this same chapter Mark tells us that 5,000 people lingered in that deserted place long past the time they should have been heading home for food and shelter. They ran and they stayed, because Jesus was feeding their souls – filling their spiritual bellies.

What was he telling them? Certainly it was something different from what God complained about through Jeremiah. Jesus drew the people; those shepherds scattered the people. What pasture, so to speak, did Jesus lead them to, that satisfied the hunger of their souls? What did he teach them that answered those aching questions, “Who am I?” “Why am I here?” Whatever he said, it seemed to me that the answer would hold good 2,000 years later, or even 20,000 years. I'll get to that in a moment, but first let me guess what the pseudo shepherds in Jeremiah might have been saying.

Their answers probably ran along three basic lines, focusing on the body, the mind or the emotions. What would these answers sound like translated into today's idiom? First, they suggest we turn to our bodies for meaning; that is, our physical activities. Take self care: some people become vegans, or locavors – that is, those who eat foods grown locally. Some take up a healthful body practice, such as Yoga or Tai Chi. It could also be the care of others. Mother Theresa springs to mind, a tireless giver of her physical strength to help the poorest of the poor. Whether we do these things to care for our own health or for the well-being of others, these are acts of compassion, and they truly count as basic values, not to be despised.

As another source of meaning, they suggest we turn to our minds. Most of us feel stagnant if we are not learning and growing intellectually. We hear about life-long learning, as if it were something novel, brought on by the pace of technological advances; but isn't the quest for understanding innate in us? Don't we seek truth for its own sake, quite apart from any sense of security it gives or power? I think of Linus Pauling, Nobel Prize winner in two fields, doing research and publishing scientific papers into his 90's. Seeking knowledge, insight, understanding and truth also count as basic values, and not to be scorned.

Finally, they suggest we turn to emotion to find meaning. Many of us immerse ourselves in one of the arts, either as a creator or an appreciator. Music, for instance, can take us beyond words and thoughts. Think of art's power to lay bare injustices and make us feel their ugliness. Or its power to instill hope, compassion, or sometimes, fear. A friend of mine is an Episcopal nun, now in her 80's, who holds a PhD in composition from Julliard. She told me that she had to study the compositions of Bach in small doses, because she found the sheer beauty of them almost unbearable. So immersing ourselves in art and aesthetics makes a third basic value.

These three areas of our being – body, mind, and emotion – interlock and make up the stuff of life. They do not, however, make life worth living. In our quest for meaning, the three answers I just gave do not add up to what Jesus must have been telling the people. They are modern-day examples of what Jeremiah's priests might have said. You get a sense of how these answers fall short by asking yourself a variation on this question. Do I live to eat or eat to live? If I live to eat I am living with only a fraction of my whole self. So, too, with answers centered on the body: do I live to serve or serve to live? Doesn't it feel somehow inadequate to say I live to serve? To say I serve to live, on the other hand, implies something larger than my serving. Likewise with the mind: do I live in order to learn, or learn in order to live? Again, the second answer implies that living is larger than learning. So too with the emotional life. I dance in order to live; I paint in order to live; I go to the opera in order to live. Okay. Is there anything we live to do? What do we live to do?

We live to pray. We live to worship. Let me quote Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel from his book, Quest for God. “Prayer is not a need but an ontological necessity, an act that constitutes the very essence of [humankind]. [The one] who has never prayed is not fully human.” In other words we pray in order to become whole. We pray in order to realize the fullness of who we are, and that fullness goes beyond everything we do, think or feel – beyond anything we may accomplish. Through prayer we become aware of the life of Christ in us – not an alien life, not an added life, but the real depth and breadth of our own true life.

For example, I read recently that as a young man, the Russian writer, Fyodor Dostoevsky, had allied himself with the rising socialist movement in Russia, and scorned religion. In 1849 the secret police rounded up the group of student radicals to which he belonged, and caught Dostoevsky among them. He was sentenced to five years' hard labor in Siberia. In 1854 he returned to St. Petersburg, now a devout Christian. What had turned him around? As he told it, it was the simple faith in Jesus Christ of the people he lived among in the gulag. Privation, illness and exhaustion kept them from almost any accomplishment other than bare survival; yet they retained their dignity thanks to their devotion.

Devotion to God, however we express it, answers the question, “Who am I?” “Why am I here?” Once we have that in place the rest can follow – all our activities and accomplishments in the realms of doing, thinking and feeling. As long as none of them are being asked to carry the full burden of meaning, they become the substance of our lives, but not the goal. They are like love letters. Suppose I compose the most beautiful love letter I know how to write, but I do it simply for the sake of the letter itself; won't my soul wither in time? I need the beloved. In all we do we need the beloved. Not any beloved, but the beloved. Prayer, we could say, sends the love letter.

That, it seems to me, is what Jesus was teaching the people: the proper ordering of our devotion. He was teaching the secret of being fully human. The secret of that strange peace and joy that stand up to any gulag. The secret that meets God's criteria for spiritual leadership; that is, to nourish God's flock and keep it together, and not only outwardly as a parish community, but inwardly, also, in our soul's integrity. The secret is prayer.